A systemic framework for sustainability assessment / (Record no. 9122)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02327nam a22001937a 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20210604140814.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 210604b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number e-book (SD)
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Sala, S.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title A systemic framework for sustainability assessment /
Statement of responsibility, etc Serenella Sala, Biagio Ciuffo, and Peter Nijkamp
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Amsterdam, Netherlands :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Elsevier,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2015.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 13 p. :
Other physical details ill. ;
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE
Bibliography, etc Includes bibliographical index and references.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc A b s t r a c t<br/><br/>Sustainability assessment (SA) is a complex appraisal method. It is conducted for supporting decision-making and policy in a broad environmental, economic and social context, and transcends a purely technical/scientific evaluation. This paper focusses on the systematisation of knowledge on technical/scientific sustainability evaluation, by addressing critical decision-making elements focussed on by domain experts. We make a distinction between integrated assessment and SA. Our systemic approach outlines how to move from integrated assessment to SA. The fundamental differences involved concern three levels: ontological, methodological and epistemological.We present a novel methodological framework for SA, based on a literature meta-review of multi-scale and multipurpose appraisalmethodologies, models and indicators. SA is essentially a structured procedure encompassing different field-specific analytical methods and models, for specific applications and decision contexts. External inputs<br/>to the methodology are “values” considered in the analysis and boundaries defined, including the relevant sustainability framework. Internal methodological elements comprise approach to be adopted (e.g. “what-if” vs. “what to”), scenario design and analytical models and measurable indicators for operational analysis.Methods to quantify uncertainty are key ingredients of the assessment framework. The paper highlights the relevance of and policy challenges for SA development, with due attention for applicability in real-world decision contexts.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element 1. Sustainability science 2. Sustainability assessment 3. Integrated assessment 4. Boundaries 5. Policy support 6. Science–policy interface 7. Policy option assessment
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Ciuffo, B.
710 ## - ADDED ENTRY--CORPORATE NAME
Corporate name or jurisdiction name as entry element Nijkamp, P.
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type E-Book
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     College of Natural Resources College of Natural Resources 04/06/2021   e-book (SD) 04/06/2021 04/06/2021 E-Book

College of Natural Resources, Royal University of Bhutan | ©
Office: +975 02 376247 (Ext. 2004), E-mail: library.cnr@rub.edu.bt